There are more than twenty AI note-takers courting therapists right now, and their marketing pages all say the same things. This guide gives you a decision framework instead: six factors that actually differentiate them, a trial protocol, and three ready-made recommendations by practice type.
TheraIndex may earn a commission from some links below — it never affects our rankings.
Factor 1: Note formats — yours, not theirs
If you write DAP notes, a tool that's brilliant at medical SOAP notes and mediocre at DAP is the wrong tool. Check for:
- Your primary format (SOAP, DAP, BIRP, GIRP) done well, not just offered
- Modality-specific formats if you need them — EMDR and couples notes are where generic tools fall down (Upheal covers both; mental-health-only tools generally beat general-medical ones here)
- Customization — can you edit the template until it sounds like you? (Heidi leans heavily on this)
- Treatment plans and intake summaries if you want more than progress notes (Mentalyc is strongest here)
Factor 2: How the session gets captured
Three capture modes, with very different privacy and consent implications:
- Ambient recording (live listening, in-person or telehealth) — least effort, best detail, but requires recording consent and raises the stakes on audio-retention policy.
- Dictated recap — you talk about the session for two minutes afterward. No client recording, no consent complexity, ~80% of the time savings. Every good tool supports this; it's also your opt-out path for clients who decline recording.
- Typed summary — a few bullet points in, a full note out. Slowest, most private (AutoNotes built its niche here).
Pick a tool that's good at the mode you'll actually use — and check the recording-consent rules in your state before defaulting to ambient.
Factor 3: Pricing model vs your caseload
- Per-note caps (Mentalyc's $14.99/mo for 40 notes, Freed's $39/mo starter): cheap for part-time caseloads, punitive for full ones.
- Unlimited subscriptions (Freed's $79/mo tier, Berries ~$39/mo): predictable; best for 25+ sessions/week.
- Usage-based (Upheal's $1/session capped ~$69/mo): elegant for variable caseloads.
- Free tiers (Heidi's unlimited free notes, Upheal's free plan): real, but confirm the BAA applies at the free level — see our free tools guide.
Rule of thumb: count your weekly sessions, multiply by 4.3, and price each tool at that volume. The cheapest headline price is rarely the cheapest tool.
Factor 4: Privacy posture (the non-negotiables)
Full detail in our HIPAA guide, but the short version — before real client data touches anything, you want in writing:
- A signed BAA
- Audio deleted after note generation (or a retention window you accept)
- No training on your identifiable data
Every scribe in our directory lists BAA status; treat any vendor vagueness here as a no.
Factor 5: Where the note ends up
Most scribes produce copy-paste-ready notes for any EHR — a minor daily friction. If you want notes landing inside the chart automatically, your options narrow: your EHR's native AI (like SimplePractice's Note Taker add-on — see our EHR comparison) or a scribe with a real integration to your specific EHR. Decide how much the copy-paste bothers you before paying an integration premium.
Factor 6: The feel test
After a week of drafts: Does it sound like you, or do you rewrite every paragraph? Does editing take two minutes or ten? Trust that impression — a note-taker you low-key resent is one you'll stop using by month two.
The trial protocol
- Shortlist two tools (three burns you out).
- Record a mock session — a colleague role-playing a client, or yourself running both chairs. Never real PHI on a trial before the BAA is signed.
- Run the same mock session through both tools; compare drafts against a note you'd actually sign.
- Test your real capture mode (ambient and dictated recap).
- Time the edit. Draft quality matters less than draft-to-signed time.
- Sign the BAA of the winner, add consent language to your intake forms, then go live with real sessions.
Three ready-made answers
- Solo, cash-pay, full caseload: Freed ($79/mo unlimited, zero audio retention) or Berries (~$39/mo, whole-workflow).
- Insurance-heavy practice: Mentalyc — therapy formats plus audit-friendly progress tracking.
- Testing the waters for $0: Upheal (mental-health-specific free plan) or Heidi (unlimited free notes, more template tuning).
Or start from the full field: all 21 AI scribes compared, the scribe category, and the complete guide to AI for therapists.
FAQ
How long does it take to know if a tool fits? Five to ten sessions. Draft quality is obvious immediately; whether editing stays tolerable takes a week to feel.
Should I pick my EHR's AI notes or a standalone scribe? EHR AI wins on workflow (no copy-paste); standalone scribes usually win on therapy-note quality. Trial your EHR's add-on against one specialist and compare drafts.
Can these tools do couples or EMDR notes? The mental-health specialists can — Upheal ships both formats natively. General-medical scribes struggle; test specifically for it.
What about group therapy notes? The weakest spot in the category — most tools are built for one-client sessions. If group notes dominate your week, test that scenario explicitly before subscribing.